Is this a Hindu Rashtra ? Advocate see the errors apparent on the
record
Could it be said in a different context, that the Hindu
Rashtra has been daclared today ?
Rightly said. Sunni Waqf Board to seek review of today’s
Ayodhya juudgment.
As an advocate, I can see the errors apparent on the record. The judgment has held that 1) ASI found the Masjid was built above a structure but it could not be said to be a temple; 2) The masjid was not built after demolishing a temple; 3) The placement of the deity Ram Lalla inside the masjid in 1949 was illegal ; and 4) The demolition of Babri Masjid in 1992 was a violation of the law.
And yet the judgment has erred by deciding the ownership of
the deity Ram Lalla over the disputed site and allowing the construction of a
Ram Temple over the disputed site. These errors and contradictions are so
apperent.
Could it be said in a different context, that the Hindu
Rashtra has been declared today?
– By Aurobindo Ghose,
Human Rights lawyer
- Why does Justice Katju appeal to Tamil Nadu lawyers to give some time to Justice Victoria Gowri?
- #Breaking: Latest News |Today’s big news headlines | 06 February 2023 news.
- #Breaking: Latest News |Today’s big news headlines | 05 February 2023 news.
- A Tale of Two Dinners
- Justice Katju writes to Yogi Adityanath on misbehaviour with Kashmiri dry fruit vendors in Lucknow
हमें गूगल न्यूज पर फॉलो करें. ट्विटर पर फॉलो करें. वाट्सएप पर संदेश पाएं. हस्तक्षेप की आर्थिक मदद करें