Is this a Hindu Rashtra ? Advocate see the errors apparent on the
record
Could it be said in a different context, that the Hindu
Rashtra has been daclared today ?
Rightly said. Sunni Waqf Board to seek review of today’s
Ayodhya juudgment.
As an advocate, I can see the errors apparent on the record. The judgment has held that 1) ASI found the Masjid was built above a structure but it could not be said to be a temple; 2) The masjid was not built after demolishing a temple; 3) The placement of the deity Ram Lalla inside the masjid in 1949 was illegal ; and 4) The demolition of Babri Masjid in 1992 was a violation of the law.
And yet the judgment has erred by deciding the ownership of
the deity Ram Lalla over the disputed site and allowing the construction of a
Ram Temple over the disputed site. These errors and contradictions are so
apperent.
Could it be said in a different context, that the Hindu
Rashtra has been declared today?
– By Aurobindo Ghose,
Human Rights lawyer
- Namaste Trump : Bhim Singh Hopes that Trump shall express on Non-Alignment
- DD India’s Global Coverage of President Trump’s Visit to India
- Drugs targeting immune cells may help treat deadly disease mainly affecting children : Study
- Maternal obesity may increase a child’s risk for ADHD
- S.C. and Shaheen Bagh : The Way Out
Be the first to comment on "#AyodhyaVerdict #SupremeCourt #AyodhyaJudgment : Is this a Hindu Rashtra ? Advocate see the errors apparent on the record"