Is this a Hindu Rashtra ? Advocate see the errors apparent on the
record

Could it be said in a different context, that the Hindu
Rashtra has been daclared today ?

Rightly said. Sunni Waqf Board to seek review of today’s
Ayodhya juudgment.

As an advocate, I can see the errors apparent on the record. The judgment has held that 1) ASI found the Masjid was built above a structure but it could not be said to be a temple; 2)  The masjid was not built after demolishing a temple; 3) The placement of the deity  Ram Lalla inside the masjid in 1949 was illegal ; and 4) The demolition of Babri Masjid in 1992 was a violation of the law.

And yet the judgment has erred by deciding the ownership of
the deity Ram Lalla over the disputed site and allowing the construction of a
Ram Temple over the disputed site. These errors and contradictions are so
apperent.

Could it be said in a different context, that the Hindu
Rashtra has been declared today?

– By Aurobindo Ghose,

Human Rights lawyer

• The farmers laws will not be withdrawn, reveals Justice Katju
• Mera Jism Meri Marzi is a wrong slogan
• Have I defamed the Indian judiciary, or has the judiciary defamed itself by its repeated misbehaviour? Asks Justice Katju.
• El Salvador certified as malaria-free by WHO
• Influenza vaccine composition for 2020-2021 northern hemisphere influenza season

Sharing is caring!