In a shocking development the student wing of the
RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with the Savarkar’s
on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20,
2019. This clubbing of busts of Bhagat Singh and Netaji with VD Savarkar is
tantamount to 2nd killing of the 2 great martyrs who laid down their lives for
the freedom of the country. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a
socialist-democratic-secular Republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting
of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India. The
contemporary documents are witness to the fact that while Bhagat Singh and
Netaji fought against the repressive British rule and the two-nation theory, as
Savarkar brazenly sided with the British rulers and the Muslim League in order
to defeat the all-inclusive freedom struggle.

‘Veer’ Savarkar Submitted
FIVE Mercy Petitions

The most shameful and shocking part of this
combination of busts is that whereas Bhagat Singh and Netaji never subjected to
the diktats of the colonial masters, never repented and never sought mercy this
Hindutva ‘Veer’ submitted in all five mercy petitions in 1911, 1913, 1914, 1918
and 1920.[i] This ‘Veer’
though sentenced for 50 years (in 1910-1911), was in the Cellular Jail for less
than 10 years and was finally released in 1924 from Yerwada Jail in
Maharashtra. Thus he was able to secure remission of more than 35 years. There
were hundreds of other revolutionaries who in the Cellular Jail and other jails
remained incarcerated for full terms of their convictions. There were, of
course, martyrs like Bhagat Singh, Chandershekhar Azad, Ram Prasad Bismil,
Ashfaqullah Khan, Sukhdev, Rajguru and Roshan Singh who neither begged for
mercy nor were shown any leniency. There was also large number of Ghadarite
revolutionaries and Bengal revolutionaries who refused “to plead with the
British authorities for mercy. Nor did they agree to give up their struggle for
India’s liberty in exchange of their own personal liberty.”[ii]

How Savarkar Backstabbed Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose

Netaji during World War II was trying to secure foreign support for liberation
of the country and trying to organise a military attack on the northeast of the
country which finally culminated in the formation of  ‘Azad Hind Fauj’ (Indian National Army), it
was Savarkar who offered full military cooperation to the British masters.
While addressing 23rd session of Hindu Mahasabha at Bhagalpur in 1941, he said:

“The war which has now reached our shores directly constitutes at
once a danger and an opportunity which both render it imperative that the
militarization movement musts be intensified and every branch of the Hindu
Mahasabha in every town and village must actively engage itself in rousing the
Hindu people to join the army, navy, the aerial forces and the different
war-craft manufactories.”[iii]

To what extent
Savarkar was willing to help the British would be clear by the following words
of his:

“So far as India’s defence is concerned, Hindudom must ally
unhesitatingly, in a spirit of responsive co-operation with the war effort of
the Indian government in so far as it is consistent with the Hindu interests,
by joining the Army, Navy and the Aerial forces in as large a number as
possible and by securing an entry into all ordnance, ammunition and war craft
factories…Again it must be noted that Japan’s entry into the war has exposed us
directly and immediately to the attack by Britain’s enemies. Consequently,
whether we like it or not, we shall have to defend our own hearth and home
against the ravages of the war and this can only be done by intensifying the
government’s war effort to defend India. Hindu Mahasabhaits must, therefore,
rouse Hindus especially in the provinces of Bengal and Assam as effectively as
possible to enter the military forces of all arms without losing a single minute.”[iv]

Savarkar’s total
support to the British war efforts when leaders like Subhash Chandra Bose were
trying to chalk out a strategy to throw out the British rule from India through
armed struggle was the result of a well-thought-out Hindutva design. It was in
Madura (22nd session of the Hindu Mahasabha, 1940) that he made his choice
clear. His support to the British rested on the logic that “it is altogether improbable that in this
war England will be defeated so disastrously as to get compelled to hand over
her Indian Empire, lock, stock and barrel into German hands”[v]
thus believing in the invincibility of the British Empire.

It was not as if
Savarkar was unaware of the strong resentment which was brewing in the ranks of
common Indians against such an approach. He brushed aside any criticism of
Hindu Mahasabha’s decision of co-operating with the British in war efforts as,

“political folly into which the Indian public is accustomed to
indulge in thinking that because Indian interests are opposed to the British
interests in general, any step in which we join hands with the British
government must necessarily be an act of surrender, anti-national, of playing
into the British hands and that co-operation with the British government in any
case and under all circumstances is unpatriotic and condemnable.”[vi]

Savarkar spent the
next few years in organizing recruitment camps for the British armed forces
which were to slaughter the cadres of INA in different parts of North-East
later. The Madura conference of Hindu Mahasabha concluded with the adoption of
an ‘immediate programme’ which stressed “to
secure entry for as many Hindus recruits as possible into army, navy and the
air forces”.[vii]
He also informed them that through the efforts of Hindu Mahasabha alone, one lakh
Hindu’s were recruited in the British armed forces in one year. It is to be
noted that during this period RSS continued inviting Savarkar to address the
RSS youth gatheringsfor motivating the latter to recruit into the British armed

His call to the
Hindus had no ambiguity: “Let the
Hindus therefore come forward now and enter the army, the navy and the
air-forces, the ordnance and other war-crafts factories in their thousands and
Hindu Mahasabha under Savarkar’s leadership organised high-level Boards
in different regions of the country to help the Hindus seeking recruitment in
the British armed forces. We come to know through the following words of
Savarkar that these Boards were in direct contact with the British government.
Savarkar informed the cadres,

“To deal with the difficulties and the grievances which the Hindu
recruits to the Army find from time to time, a Central Northern Hindu
Militarization Board has been formed by the Hindu Mahasabha at Delhi with Mr.
Ganpat Rai, B.A., L.L.B Advocate, 51, Panchkuin Road, New Delhi, as convener. A
Central Southern Hindu Militarization Board is also formed under the
Chairmanship or Mr. L.B. Bhopatkar, M.A., LL.B., President Maharashtra
Provincial Hindusabha, Sadashiv Peth Poona. All complaints or applications for information
etc. should be addressed by those Hindus who want to enter the forces or have
already enlisted themselves in them, to the above addresses. Sir Jwala Prasad
Shrivastav; Barrister Jamnadasji Mehta, Bombay; Mr.

V.V. Kalikar, M.L.C., Nagpur and other members on the National Defence
Council or the Advisory War Committee will certainly try their best to get
these difficulties removed so far as possible when they are forwarded by these
Militarization Boards on to them.”[ix]

This clearly shows
that the British Government had accommodated leaders of the Hindu Mahasabha on
its official war committees. Those who declare Savarkar as a great patriot and
freedom fighter must bow their heads in shame when they read the following
instruction from Savarkar to those Hindus who were to join the British forces:

“One point however must be noted in this connection as
emphatically as possible in our own interest that those Hindus who join the
Indian [read the British] Forces should be perfectly amenable and obedient to the
military discipline and order which may prevail there provided always that the
latter do not deliberately aim to humiliate Hindu Honour.”[x]

The British
Government was in regular touch with Savarkar so far as the organisation of its
highest war bodies was concerned. It included individuals whose names were
proposed by Savarkar. This is made clear from the following thanksgiving
telegram Savarkar sent to the British government. Bhide’s volume tells us that,

“The following Telegram was sent by Barrister V.D. Savarker [sic],
the President of the Hindu Mahasabha to (1) General Wavell, the Commander
in-Chief; and (2) the Viceroy of India on the 18th instant (July 18, 1941).

original text.]

It is important to
note here that even the Muslim League, sub-serving the interests of the British
rulers, refused to join Defence Committees established by the government as
done by Savarkar.

Savarkar Believed In Two-Nation Theory & Formed Coalition
Governments with the Muslim League

Savarkar openly opposed
the dream of Bhagat Singh and Netaji of a free democratic-secular India. On the
contrary he demanded an exclusive Hindu nation and chalked out his Two-nation
theory long before the Muslim League. While addressing the 19th Session of
Hindu Mahasabha at Ahmedabad in 1937, he said:

“As it is, there are two
antagonistic nations living side by side in India. Several infantile
politicians commit the serious mistake in supposing that India is already
welded into a harmonious nation, or that it could be welded thus for the mere
wish to do so. These our well-meaning but unthinking friends take their dreams
for realities. That is why they are impatient of communal tangles and attribute
them to communal organizations. But the solid fact is that the so-called
communal questions are but a legacy handed down to us by centuries of cultural,
religious and national antagonism between the Hindus and Moslems… Let us
bravely face unpleasant facts as they are. India cannot be assumed today to be
a Unitarian and homogenous nation, but on the contrary there are two nations in
the main: the Hindus and the Moslems, in India.”[xii]

The fact should not be
missed that Muslim League passed its Pakistan resolution in 1940 only.
Savarkar, the great philosopher and guide of RSS, not only propagated
Two-Nation Theory long before but entered into alliances with Muslim League in
order to break ‘Quit India Movement’. While delivering Presidential address to
the 24th session of Hindu Mahasabha at Cawnpore (Kanpur) in 1942, he defended
hobnobbing with the Muslim League in the following words,

“In practical politics also the
Mahasabha knows that we must advance through reasonable compromises. Witness
the fact that only recently in Sind, the Sind-Hindu-Sabha on invitation had
taken the responsibility of joining hands with the League itself in running
coalition Government. The case of Bengal is well known. Wild Leaguers whom even
the Congress with all its submissiveness could not placate grew quite
reasonably compromising and socialable as soon as they came in contact with the
Hindu Mahasabha and the Coalition Government, under the premiership of Mr.
Fazlul Huq and the able lead of our esteemed Mahasabha leader Dr. Syama Prasad
Mookerji, functioned successfully for a year or so to the benefit of both the
communities. Moreover further events also proved demonstratively that the Hindu
Mahasabhaits endeavoured to capture the centres of political power only in the
public interests and not for the leaves and fishes of the office.”[xiii]

It is to be noted that in this
coalition government Syama Prasad Mukherjee, second in command of the Hindu
Mahasabha was Deputy Premier. Hindu Mahasabha and Muslim League also formed a
coalition government in NWFP also.

With these irrefutable facts from
history, even available in the Hindutva organizations’ archives, the appearance
of Savarkar bust with the great martyrs only means second killing of the

Shamsul Islam

[i] For texts of
Savarkar’s mercy petitions see the following link:

[ii] Manini Chatterjee, ‘The Kala Pani story’ The
Indian Express
, September 21, 2004.

[iii]Cited in Savarkar, V. D., Samagra Savarkar Wangmaya: Hindu Rashtra
, vol. 6, Maharashtra Prantik Hindusabha, Poona, 1963, pp. 460-61.

[iv]Ibid., p. 460.

[v]Ibid., p. 419.

[vi]Ibid., p. 428.

[vii]Ibid., p. 439.

[viii]Ibid., p.xxvi.

[ix]Ibid., p. xxvii.

[x]Ibid., p. xxviii.

[xi]Ibid, p. 451.

[xii] Samagar
Savarkar Wangmaya
(Collected Works of Savarkar), Hindu Mahasabha,  Poona, 1963, p.296

[xiii] Ibid, pp. 479-480, Hindu Mahasabha and
Muslim League also ran a coalition government in North-Western Frontier